Wednesday, September 29, 2010

A Note About Fat: Part I

This was meant to be a small aside commenting on weight and food issues, inspired by watching Jamie Oliver's American Food Revolution, but it turned out to be so much more. In fact, this is only a small part...

I moved from my hometown in New Zealand to London in May 2009, leaving behind my parents, friends and (almost) everyone I had ever known. Nine months later, I went to the airport to meet my mother who had come to visit. As expected, the first thing she said to me was "How great to see you!".
The second thing: "I don't like what you're wearing. It shows too much of your fat thighs."

Not expected.

That is, not expected if you haven't lived with my mother for 23 years. First off, I should say, I don't hate my mother. This isn't a rant about how terrible my parents are and how I would have been better off if they had sent me off down the river in a basket made of reeds. I think my parents did an amazing job, and I generally look back on my childhood with fond memories tinted pink by the passing of time. However, there is one area where my parents and I disagree, and it has caused some of the most painful memories of my childhood, and also adult life, like the comment above. One part of me that my parents didn't praise me for and want to show off to the whole world in small wallet-sized photographs or framed school reports.

My weight.

What feels like an uphill battle with my parents has been going on for what feels like forever, or certainly since I was old enough to have coherent memories of my childhood. I can remember dressing for a school photo* when I was five years old, and my mum telling me what I should wear to cover up my "chubby bits". As I moved through the years, this was always the goal when buying clothes. To "show off my only thin bits" - my legs. My mother, heavily influenced by the 80s, saw the perfect remedy to her daughter's "problem" in leggings and big jumpers. As fashions changed, I wanted to change too. Let me wear what all the cool kids are wearing! But my mum, and dad too, not that he had much involvement in what I wore, told me that I couldn't wear the fashions of the day, because of what they liked to euphemistically refer to as my "size".

Friends'parents, also, regularly commented on what I was wearing. Comments that started out in a perfectly polite vein, such as, "I like your outfit today..." ended with a sting in the tail that mirrored my parents' comments "... It doesn't make you look as fat as what you wore yesterday." Needless to say, as soon as I had any control over it, I saw those parents as little as possible. But the idea that I looked bad, that I had a weight problem, that there was something wrong with my body, stuck with me.

 As a child, this was deeply disheartening. The messages of popular culture for kids in the late 80s and early 90s had major themes of loving yourself, being happy with who you are, and all the other sorts of positive reinforcement about accepting difference that were delivered to kids with accompanying neon cartoons and a soundtrack of half-hearted rap songs. Being the easily manipulated educated young thing that I was, I lapped this up. People will like me for me! It doesn't matter what you look like, as long as you are a nice person! Accept everyone!

I couldn't understand why my parents didn't accept me.

As I reached my teen years, the time when practically all people have issues with acceptance, their body, and petty things like popularity, I began to see that (in some ways) my parents had been right. They were only relaying the prejudices about appearance and weight that the blissful ignorance of youth had kept hidden from me before. With the onset of puberty, the same judgement came at me from classmates as it did from my parents. Being picked last for sports teams. Hardly any boys having crushes on me (and one of those who did only doing so for a dare!). All traumatic experiences that seem to be handpicked from a reference entitled 'The Worst Parts of Being a Teenager'. Looking back now, I can see that the behaviour was typical pettiness. A way for some kids to make themselves feel superior by putting others down. But at the time it didn't feel like that. They were only confirming what I had been told most of my life. I was fat. And that wasn't something you wanted to be.

I staunchly kept silent about my unhappy moments at school. I did not want to let my parents know that I was anything less than happy with my body. Because, at this time, I had no problems with my body. It was just the way that other people treated me based on my body that caused my unhappiness. And that included the way my parents treated me. Instead of comforting me and offering me sage advice on standing up to bullies and being true to yourself, I knew that my parents would tell me that if I was thinner this wouldn't happen. That in reality, I had brought teasing and unpopularity on myself because I was fat.

My mother's way of dealing with my fat, which I could feel offended her so much through every stinging comment, was dieting. This was my mother's own personal beliefs, in which anything that contained fat was bad (read: almost everything), as well as anything that contained sugar (almost everything else). Celery and carrot sticks. Low fat cottage cheese. Bran flakes and apple slices. These were the foods that you should live off. Shopping for food with my mother was something like a reverse game show. Whenever you pointed at a product, she would tell you exactly what was wrong with it. Everything was "laden with fat" or "full of sugar" or just "really bad for you". Most of the staple 'exciting' parts of a packed lunch (in New Zealand, unlike the UK, everyone brings a packed lunch to school, from primary through secondary) - a small packet of crisps, some dried fruit and nuts, a muffin - were deemed too unhealthy for me. As a result, I ate in secret. I didn't understand why other kids could have these foods, and not be made to feel bad about what they were eating, so I ate those things too. And I didn'r feel bad about it. Take that, mum! Sadly, I probably ate more than everyone else was eating, and what was probably actual overeating encouraged my mum in my quest to 'help' me fit into an 'acceptable' size for society.

I know she was trying to help, to shelter me from the cruel truths and prejudices of the world by making me fit into the mold that society has for 'woman' or 'girl'. But shouldn't she have done it the other way around? Made society less cruel, easier for me to fit in as I was? She gave me an androgynous name, so that my future career prospects wouldn't be determined by my gender/sex, by apparently the feminist revolution didn't extend to fat, as far as she was concerned.

Angry at the way my mother determined how I saw myself, and how I thought the world saw me, and around the same time that I started high school, a friend and I made a pact.We were around the same 'size', and went to the same primary school, so were kindred spirits in our experience as 'fat' kids. We decided that we would take control of how people saw us. No more hiding behind giant sweatshirts, as our parents had dressed us. We would only wear clothes that fit properly, since we figured hiding only made us look bigger than we actually were. I only vaguely remember most of the other rules, but one more stuck with me for many years, and I only broke it recently:

No shorts.

At the time, shorts on girls were worn reasonably short, above mid-thigh, unlike the later trend that led the word 'shorts' to mean any trousers that ended somewhere between your ankles and your knees (more correctly termed capri pants, pedal pushers or cropped pants, though I try to hold back my pedantic nature). I distinctly remember the comparison in our minds with sausages bursting out of their skins. Our thighs were not meant to be shown to the world. So we would not show them. Not nobody not nohow. For years afterwards, I wore jeans year-round. Even in the heat of summer, trudging up a hill on my paper route. Such was my dedication to the cause of not letting anyone see my fat.

In a narrative turn that seems to come straight out of the 'True Life' sections of Teen Vogue or Girlfriend magazine, my friend-in-fat decided to show her dedication to the cause in a different way. She basically stopped eating. In the intervening time between our summer pact and her drastic measures we had somewhat grown apart, so I can't comment as to how much she didn't eat. Her parents never seeemed to worry or show any signs that she wasn't eating at home, but every lunch she brought to school went straight in the bin instead of her mouth. The girls at school gossiped, of course, but this was nothing new. A school with 1200 girls is no stranger to eating disorders, or its more easily disguisable cousin, disordered eating. As terribly damaging as that sort of eating (or not eating) can be, no one can argue that not eating doesn't cause weight loss. My friend lost a lot of weight.

My parents noticed this weight loss, and not-so-secretly wanted this for me.

Often, they would comment to me after just seeing her walk by: "Doesn't she look nice and slim" "Why can't you look like that?". When I angrily told them the 'secret' behind her 'success', that she had practically stopped eating, my parents told me I should "probably give that a go". Shocked, I told them that was what most people called an 'eating disorder', and not exactly desirable. Had they not seen enough lifetime movies of teen gymnasts being pressured by parents to stay slim, and wrecking their bodies in the process? Was this what my parents wanted? Evidently, yes, since my father responded to my eating disorder argument against that method of weight loss with "Well, maybe you should have an eating disorder. At least then you'd lose a bit of weight!". Congratulations, Dad, your wish was granted. There have been periods of my life when I threw up everything I ate, because I was scared of what food would do to my body. But that didn't actually induce any weight loss, just anxiety and a destroyed throat. Be careful what you wish for, Dad.

End of Part I.

Next time: High school, weight loss, weight gain, and what I have learned. How exciting!

* I still have this school photo. Looking back on it now, I see a normal sized child that would not cause me to think twice about her weight if I was a parent. In case you read this thinking 'Damn, you probably were a chunky little thing and just needed to stop putting crap in your mouth' (which I hope you weren't), I was not an exceptionally fat child. A little heavier than the median, yes. Not crisis-level deathfatz, by any means. I still have no idea why my parents started targeting my weight at an early age.


Monday, January 4, 2010

My self-imposed vegan challenge!

This may seem like a complete departure from the tone of this blog so far (not that I've really been posting that much), but, for the next two months at least, this will be the place that I record all my experiences, recipes and pictures of my vegan challenge to myself.

For the next two months, until the 28th of February, I am going to eat only vegan food. I specify vegan food because I can't really call myself vegan - I'm not going to throw out my wool coat, or my leather handbag, or... well, I'm too poor to have any more clothes that involve animal products. Cheap clothes are all synthetic! But I will stop buying wool/leather/silk/any other animal dervived clothing for the next two months (possibly also related to the aforementioned poorness, but it's what we do that counts, right?).

To anyone who knows me, including my roommate, who is shaking her head predicting that I won't make it even as I type this post, it may seem like a bit of a stretch to go from omnivore to herbivore overnight. However, little do (most of them) know my secret passion:

Reading vegan food blogs

I have to admit my secret obsession so that everyone knows I am not going into this unarmed - for about a year and a half now, at least a third of the blogs in my RSS feed have been vegan cooking blogs. They were a welcome distraction to me while completing my Honours year at university back in New Zealand, and I have kept up the habit while over here in the UK. I even ordered a zine or two from those who have them (Swell Vegan, I'm looking at you...), so will love having the motivation to make some of the more 'complicated' vegan recipes.

Before lauching full-on into my experiences in eating vegan, I should probably list the reasons that I decided to make this change:
  • As a student of sociology, one of my main interests in veganism is the way that it challenges accepted food norms. In Western society, eating meat, cheese, eggs and other animals products is pretty much accepted as the norm, and while vegetarianism has gained quite a lot of ground, with vegetarian options almost always available when eating out and in supermarkets, veganism doesn't seem quite so accepted. The best way to experience the way that veganism breaks these norms is, of course, to be vegan (who knows, maybe I'll find out that there's nothing hard about being vegan in a meat-and-dairy-eating society, but I don't quite think that'll be the case...).
  • To re-evaluate my relationship with food. In the past I've been a bit of a sporadic overeater, and working crazy hours my job has made my eating habits all the more crazy. I hope that by not being able to just grab a takeaway because I'm lazy, and actually plan what food I am going to eat, I will gain some healthier attitudes to food - and healthier food as well!
  • For the environmental and ethical reasons. To be fair, I'm sure we've all read the same arguments for being vegan before: eating meat is murder, killing animals is unethical, the way that dairy cows are treated is wrong, etc. etc. All of these issues come into my decision, but the overarching idea is to make sure that my actions come into line with my political beliefs. After all, if I believe in equality and freedom, shouldn't animals be included? If I'm passionate about regulating large producers of carbon dioxide gas because of climate change, shouldn't I also stop supporting meat and dairy farmers, whose dense farming produces large amounts of harmful methane gas? For me, the worst thing to be, politically, is a hypocrite.
Maybe these reasons will expand, as I find new and exciting reasons to be vegan. But for now, it's time to eat! Hmmmm... what's in the cupboard?

Friday, May 8, 2009

Sometimes, I love The Herald

Not often, mind you.

The Herald newspaper is too Auckland-centric for its claims to being a 'national' newspaper, puffed up with self importance because everyone else in the country really cares about what the latest troubles are north of the Bombay Hills. News happens in other parts of the country, too, children, why don't you try publishing some of it? So I don't usually read The Herald.

As part of a recent job, I had to read through thousands of pages of microfilm to search for specific stories - from The Herald, The Dominion and The Press. Being stuck in a windowless basement every day may have loosened my grip on sanity somewhat, but I still think this article found in The Herald says something interesting.
"Hawk-eye watch kept on cults"
"Auckland's own cult-busters are based in a simple white house on the edge of the city's Bible belt at Mt Roskill...
Cultwatch is a Christian-based organisation that draws its workers from across the ecumenical divides. But the group insists that it is not out to Bible bash...
We are talking about central, basic, fundamental Christian beliefs. They are: the authority of the Bible, deity of Christ, Virgin birth, atonement of sin at the cross, bodily resurrection of Christ, and the belief in the Second Coming."
Did you see what they did there? Possibly not. Let's take another look.
"in a simple white house on the edge of the city's Bible belt at Mt Roskill..."
Get it now? The authors italicized the title of the Bible. Just as you would when writing a story that referred to Pride and Prejudice. While it may seem like a small act to many, it can also be seen as a slap in the face to all those fundamentalist Christians whose faith demands that they blatantly deny any authorship of the Bible. In the words of the estimable Ben Agger (someone should really make a wikipedia entry about this guy) in his book Socio(onto)logy puts it:
"In mirroring the world, we forget what is text and what is history."
In the chapter that this quote is taken from, he is referring to the way in which the format of academic journals increasingly forces the social sciences into using 'scientific' formats for their articles, meaning that the aspects of social life that sociologists discuss in their articles become scientific 'fact', and thus unable to be argued with. In this way, academic writing, by claiming to be a mirror and reflecting the 'factual' world, creates that world by presenting those facts as unarguable and true.

The same goes when talking about the Bible, something I am sure that Agger has also linked to this discussion, although for the life of me I can't find any reference in the material I have on hand. By treating the Bible as something that does not need to be referenced in the same way as other texts when writing, it denies that it is an authored document, thus denying all the subjectivities and temporality of the text.

Agger once noted that the editors of his work had trouble when he attempted to attribute the author of the bible as Jesus. But denying that it is a humanly authored text only promotes the sort of injustices that we have seen when people use scientific 'fact' as a reason for a damaging course of action, ignoring all the human subjectivities and preferences that went into creating that 'fact'. By citing the Bible as any other text, we renew the divide between text and history.

And for that I say, GO THE HERALD.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

The randomness of trawling through archives...

Part of my job at the moment involves looking through the photographic collection at the National library. Most of the records that I skim past are relatively boring, such as 'Mobil, policemen in car' or 'Photographs of wrecked boats'.

But sometimes, the descriptions of photos are so completely strange, they make you laugh out loud. Luckily, part of my work can be done at home, so I managed to dodge the label of crazy-talks-to-herself-in-the-library-lady.

'Creator of collection unknown
Photographs taken by donor while insane'

Let's just mull this over for a second, shall we?

A collection of three photos. The record doesn't say what the photos are of. Or who took them. But the library knows that they were taken while the photographer was insane.

Brilliant.

Another photo that caught my eye, this time while actually looking through the (really badly organised) folders of photos, was a collection of 'erotic' novels seized by customs in 1990.

Retro porn. Awesome.

While some may think that writing erotic fiction is the pasttime of washed up authors or people who can't get a real job, the pen names some of these people chose reveals genius.

Examples:

- Donna Derriere
- Ina Haystack
- Tom Katt
- Stu Wart
- Dick Wiggins
- Rod Strong
- Justin Case
- U.R. Dumb
- John Boring
- Juan Tonn

Some of these are just standard sex puns. Donna Derriere. Dick Wiggins. Good for a snigger and then move on. Some are more questionable. Aren't you meant to not insult your readers? I wonder if U.R. Dumb sold many books. And also, is Juan Tonn meant to be a really bad play on 'Won Ton'?

Nonetheless, I bet the books by John Boring were real scorchers.

Bet you wish you could get your hands on some of these books.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

7 Party ideas brought to you by ALAC

The wonderful folks at the Alcohol Advisory Council have put out a booklet this summer, detailing how to celebrate responsibly. Included are some fantastic ideas for party themes. I will assume that since the tone of the booklet is that you can party responsibly and have fun without getting drunk, these are meant to be fun themes to have instead of comsuming massive amoumts of alcohol at your party. I say, some of these would only make sense if you were *very* smashed.

1. Williams
2. Creepy
3. Quiet
4. Uni Student
5. (famous) lovers
6. Killer Whales
7. Isocoles triangles

I like the way the creators of this list thought we needed reminding that the 'lovers' had to be famous. Like otherwise people would just turn up in pairs acting all mushy? What kind of party theme would that be anyway?

The mind boggles. Also check out #6. A little bit specific for a theme, I think. It's not like you're leaving much room for the guests to get creative... But really, when I think of the theme 'killer whales', all I can think of is this.

Do you think these are fantastic, and can't wait to host a party of your own? Let's take a look at #7 again: Isocoles triangles. Not just triangles. But a specific type of triangle. You can just imagine the host of that party turning someone away at the door:

"No way man, those triangles are equilateral, you're OUTTA HERE!"
So I'm amped to host my next party now... but be warned, those triangles better be isocoles!